On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 09:46:59AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > Do we really need systemd-less builds? I'm not convinced this is > > > something relevant to Debian. > > Not at all. > > This would be a lot of work for the benefit of a tiny audience: the > > disturbed people who hate systemd so much that they cannot accept even > > that libsystemd is installed on their computers. > > > > - OR - > > > Not at all. > > This would be a lot of work for the benefit of a tiny audience: the > > disturbed people who hate [non-free] so much that they cannot accept even > > that [any non-free software] is installed on their computers. Indeed, this is amusingly similar to the recent Ian's proposal.
> I suspect that having the archive split into main/contrib/non-free > involves a non-trivial amount of work. Yet Debian as a project, to > serve its users and derivatives, undertakes the work. There are two kinds of reasons why we do the separation. One is not relevant to "cannot accept even that [any non-free software] is installed" and another is, indeed, wrong. > That said, I find that your characterization of someone not wanting > systemd installed on their system as "disturbed" to itself be somewhat > disturbing. You are confusing libsystemd with systemd (and installed with enabled). -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
