On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 04:46:24PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Yes. We're approaching a worst-of-both-worlds scenario: We're not Free > enough to have the FSF recommend us, and we're not non-free enough for > our OS to run on current hardware used by Linux beginners, and cause > them to end up with OSses that are (a) not Debian, and (b) even less > Free than Debian.
Well articulated. But this is more of an website problem. We already have installers with non-free firmwares, we just hide them under "unofficial[1]" We have a conflict between "We don't hide problems" and the FSF "don't recommend non-free software". The FSF stand is that we recommend nonfree software already - by having links to non-free software in our web and wiki[2]. So we might as well add proper links to the non-free software in the installer CD page. [1] http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/ [2] https://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.en.html
