On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 21:29 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > In my honest opinion, rating certain content types within a package should > > be > > done along the lines of PEGI[1]. A self regulatory rating done as part of a > > social policy and administered by the particular packages maintainer. All > > subsequent questioning of rating would be done via bug reports against the > > particular package. > > Some rating related resources are at: > > https://wiki.debian.org/OpenRating > > > * Rating set within debian folder - maybe rating file. > > Personally I think a debtags/screenshots style service would be better here. > > > * Seen on packages.d.o, PTS and query by apt etc. for package. > > * Should not be auto installed as a recommends etc. > > Preferably configurable, perhaps by installing packages with standard names. >
Hi, Thanks for the link Paul. The Open Rating debtags idea I find far more appealing than package naming with the offensive or other suffix. Regards Phil -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.*** Playing the game for the games sake. Web: https://kathenas.org GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg Instagram: kathenasorg GPG: 1B97 6556 913F 73F3 9C9B 25C4 2961 D9B6 2017 A57A
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
