at bottom :-
On 17/06/2017, gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org> wrote:
<sniipped>
>
> Yeah, maybe apt-listbugs is a bit confused here:
>
> # apt-listbugs list wpasupplicant
> Retrieving bug reports... Done
> Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
> grave bugs of wpasupplicant (-> ) <Outstanding>
> b1 - #849122 - With 2.6-2 i dont have the wifi adapter in the
> (network-manager) list available.
> serious bugs of wpasupplicant (-> ) <Outstanding>
> b2 - #849077 - wpasupplicant: [Regression] Updating wpasupplicant makes not
> possible to connect to encrypted WiFi
> b3 - #849875 - broadcom-sta-dkms: Wifi association took too long, failing
> activation
> Summary:
> wpasupplicant(3 bugs)
>
<snipped>
Gregor,
Sorry for the late reply. Were you able to file a bug in apt-listbugs
or should I ? I'm still seeing the same issue/bug still.
[$] apt-listbugs list wpasupplicant
[5:32:13]
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
grave bugs of wpasupplicant (→ ) <Outstanding>
b1 - #849122 - With 2.6-2 i dont have the wifi adapter in the
(network-manager) list available.
serious bugs of wpasupplicant (→ ) <Outstanding>
b2 - #849077 - wpasupplicant: [Regression] Updating wpasupplicant
makes not possible to connect to encrypted WiFi
b3 - #849875 - broadcom-sta-dkms: Wifi association took too long,
failing activation
Summary:
wpasupplicant(3 bugs)
I don't know much about 'epoch' but I could make reference to the
discussion on debian-devel. That might be enough for the apt-listbugs
maintainers to take some call.
Btw pkg-wpa-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org seems to be a moderated list
and haven't heard anything from them till yet as well.
Looking forward to your advice/answer.
Till later.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
