On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 06:12:23 +0000, Ivan Shmakov <i...@siamics.net> wrote: > >>>>> Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> writes: > > gfortran-mingw-w64: gcc-mingw-w64 > > > * BAD: seriously, Fortran? > > Fortran is still widely used (in niche applications; WRF comes > to mind), but I see no good reason for this dependency.
Backwards-compatibility, gcc-mingw-w64 used to include the Fortran compiler. I meant to leave the Recommends there for one cycle and remove it, but forgot — it will be gone in Buster. > > gnat-mingw-w64: gcc-mingw-w64 > > > * BAD: see Fortran. > > Agreed. See above. Regards, Stephen
pgptw6LGk16se.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
