On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:29:10PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > If we had this GR in say, a month, projects would have almost a year to > migrate > their stuff away nicely, and 18 months to do it a bit more painfully.
I can see the attraction of this, and it would certainly be easier to get project consensus around factual stuff like that than the issue of having a single, project-blessed, infrastructure-hosted replacement, but without such a replacement being in-place, we will have a diaspora of projects and packages going to all sorts of different places, which would be a disaster IMHO from a contributor-complexity POV. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
