On Apr 23, Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> wrote: > The "packages drop files in /usr/*, sysadmins override in /etc" way of > doing things is prevalent in the RPM world; in Debian, however, we > traditionally have packages drop files in /etc, and let the maintainer While this scheme was probably instigated by limitations in RPM, at this point we have had multiple packages (kmod, systemd, udev for a start) using it for years.
Moving the sysctl.d default settings to /etc would be: - a waste of developers time - a gratuitous incompatibility with other distributions - inconsistent with the documentation both inside and outside Debian - inconsistent with other configuration files implementing this scheme > There are things to be said to have the whole default configuration live > in /etc; IMO, it makes it easier for a system administrator to figure > out what the current configuration is, rather than having to mentally > merge configuration files from several locations. Additionally, when a There are also good arguments for having the whole default configuration live in /usr and only local changes in /etc: e.g. this allows supporting systems with an empty /etc, which greatly reduces the administrative time needed to manage a large number of servers/containers. > configuration file that had been edited by a user is now also edited by > the package maintainer, on Debian the system will ask how to handle it, > rather than changing the defaults and not telling people (which can > break in some circumstances). In my experience as the maintainer of the packages which introduced this scheme this has not been a noticeable problem. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
