Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.pro> writes: > On 27/02/17 21:26, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> But ntpd is also known to have a large amount of code written >> without as much regard for security as one would hope. It seems >> like an unnecessary risk for most systems.
> Thanks for that security tip, I'm tempted to get rid of some ntpd > instances now, however a few more questions come to mind before I rush in: Have a look at openntpd, that's coded with security in mind. - Carsten
