On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:59:29PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > My advice would be to avoid asking the TC such general questions.
My advice too.
> There are two sensible questions:
>
> * Should the following bugs be RC ?
> [ list of 20 bugs or whatever ]
with a list of 20 bugs I dont think it's sensible. With one, yes, sure. With
two, probably…
> * I proposed the following patch to policy.
I haven't seen this yet, or rather I haven't heard that this was done yet.
> Despite it being
> seconded,
So this has neither happened…
> the policy editors have not responded to my request
> to amend policy. [or whatever]
… so this neither…
> + A FTBFS bug is still RC even if:
> + it doesn't happens on buildd.debian.net;
> + it only happens randomly;
> + it only happens on machines with one (virtual) cpu core.
while I do agree that these are *not* good criterias to justify
whether something is *not* RC, I fear there are bugs for which this is true,
however the justification why they are not RC is different.
And this is why patches to policy are hard :)
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
