Hi, On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Tino Mettler wrote: > At the end I noticed that Qt will stay at 1.0 (by glancing into the > changelog of the relevant upload) which means that my package also has > to to stay at 1.0 and the whole excitement resulted in just a changed > build-dep.
I'm not so sure about this any more: In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844018 Stepan Golosunov wrote that according to his understanding of dlsym(3), it should be fine to link a program with OpenSSL 1.1 and Qt at the same time, even though Qt links to OpenSSL 1.0. Can somebody who knows OpenSSL, Qt and dlopen/dlsym well enough confirm that? If that's true, it would (IMHO) be a major step towards a timely release of stretch with OpenSSL 1.1 as the default version. Jan
