On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:04:00 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On jueves, 17 de noviembre de 2016 00:40:42 ART Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 07:10:00PM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > The alternative for ChaCha20 would be to adopt Cloudflare's patches[1], > > > but that sort of assumes that you are only interested in openssl 1.1 for > > > ChaCha20 (and not the other changes). > > > > I'm not willing to maintain such a patch. > > I am with Kurt here. I myself didn't want to apply an untested patch to qt4 > to add libssl1.1 support without enough time to test it (because after all > qt4 is dead upstream and we can only hope for the best, but not *right* > now). > > We need to find another option.
We now have the particularly fun situation where neither openssl 1.1 (due to #844366) nor openssl 1.0 (due to #736687) can get to unstable, so if your package build-depends on openssl it's going to be some time before your package gets to unstable no matter which one you pick. Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
