On Nov 11 2016, Christoph Biedl <debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de> wrote:
> b) This is a serious issue as John D. Rebuilder should be free to choose
> on which architecture to build "src:foo".
>
> Personally, I tend to b) since
>
> * there is no sane way for the maintainer to tell the world which
> architecture should be used to rebuild this package. The .buildinfo
> file will solve this, still
> * it is certainly rather unfriendly to expect John to have a box for
> that particular architecture just to be able to do the rebuilding.
That's a good theoretical argument. But in practice, I think the subset
of architectures for which bar works correctly will always include
amd64, and John D. Rebuilder will have access to such a box for sure.
> In my opinion "src:foo" should see a "serious" bug report FTFBS,
> although it's just a victim of "bar". What about "bar"?
>
> Other suggestions?
Just fix it in "bar", and don't bother worrying about the right
severity?
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
