Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes: > There is a huge backlog of bugs to update policy, most of which are for > entirely uncontroversial changes.
> If people wanted to do the restructuring work first, all the patches on > all those bugs would have to be rewritten. Further, it is a waste of > time restructuring text that will be heavily amended/removed once those > bugs are dealt with (we're talking basic stuff where policy is just > ignored because everyone knows it is out-of-date). > So ideally a sprint would look at that backlog before the > restructuring. But of course people might not want to work on that, > which is fair enough. Yeah, that's always been my thought process too, and then I've never caught up on the backlog. :) Right now, I haven't had time to even start the backlog. :( -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
