Hi Manuel, On 09/17/16 20:53, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:13:44AM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez >> Montecelo wrote: >>> I think that one measure to improve the current situation is that, for >>> the people doing NMUs, to orphan the package when the number of NMUs >>> exceeds for example 3 or 5 in a row, or 1 year since the oldest NMU not >>> acked by the maintainers and there are bugs or reasons requiring new >>> intervention. (Exceptions can apply if there are specific reasons to >>> avoid to do that, e.g. keep packages as part of a team). With this, >>> future NMUs will be QA uploads.
> Also, I hoped to gather some feedback to the message at least, to see if > the above looks reasonable to most people. In general, the above seems reasonable to me and an improvement. Except maybe not only have 5 NMUs in a row, but also no response in e.g. half a year. That way quick NMUs in succession don't qualify. Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
