On 09/08/16 19:40, Ian Jackson wrote: > Do we _usually_ have files in .debs which are *derived from* (not just > generated by) files from other packages, whose authorship is not > represented in the resulting .deb ? > > (I think it is fair to disregard things like libgcc, whose authors > have explicitly disclaimed the requirement to notify recipients of > executables about the inclusion of libgcc.)
Any package calling inline or #defined functions from a different package? Emilio
