On 06/08/2016 10:39 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 8 June 2016 at 10:08, Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: >>> I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise" >>> model. For such a crucial service I would really prefer a real open source >>> system. But maybe I am alone with that oppinion. >> >> You're not alone. The open core approach of Gitlab worries me greatly. >> >> (I'm just a random Debian developer. I no particular say in this.) >> > > +1 > +1
Though I am not involved in this discussion and didn't read a lot of previous emails about this. I am going to assume it would be hosted on Debian's servers and not with Gitlab's hosted services. We use Gogs at the office, a (MIT licensed) Gitlab alternative. https://github.com/gogits/gogs It might be worth checking out.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
