On Tuesday 07 June 2016 11:21 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > It seems to me that the above points means that a gitlab instance would > necessarily have to start outside of the official infrastructure.
Agreed. That is is why I suggested gitlab.debian.net as first step. > I think the experiment is valid. > > Praveen, I think you could call this new thing something like > labs.debian.net. pkgs.debian.net (the fedora git server is called > pkgs.fedoraproject.org), of even dev.debian.net. or anything else, > really, as long as it exists, and is not called "gitlab" (I agree that > not calling a service by the name of the tool that provides it is a good > thing). > I like dev.debian.net. I'll proceed with finding a hosting service and sub domain. Lets call this an experiment and decide about official status once we have it running for some time.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
