Le vendredi 13 mai 2016, 10:37:35 Alexander Gerasiov a écrit : > > Do you also plan to ship all the 19 known plugins in the same > > package ? https://github.com/kedder/ofxstatement#known-plugins
> Not in ofxstatement, but in ofxstatement-plugin-name or ofxstatement-plugins. Hi, In my understanding, "package-plugins" are meant to extend functionality of "package"; where "package" can already be mostly usefull without the plugins. e.g.: "konqueror" suggests "konq-plugins" . In this case, ofxstatement is of absolutely no use by itself. Whoever made the pip3 package likely did understood that and also included ofxstatement-lithuanian & ofxstatement-czech in this archive. So I'd just roll everything, core + plugins, in one single package. > I was thinking about this. And would like to talk with guys from Python > apps packaging team. Team-maintained is a good idea. > Create separate package for every plugin looks like an overkill, may be > it would be better to merge them in one package. But since I'll put > them under team maintenance (I believe it's the right move), it would be > better to follow best practices. This is not python specific at all, it's just about trying to make packages where the metadata doesn't outweight the actual contents; & avoiding to put too much strain on ftp-masters, mirrors et all without any gain. Alexandre
