On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:06:33PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Which is fine, I guess, for someone living in an ecosystem where > > «authentication via "log in with your Google or Facebook account"» is > > all your users would ever need. > > > > I guess I should stop writing here, as at the moment I can think of a > > lot of things to write, but nothing constructive among them. > > The W3C public-rww list has some possibly interesting references related > to this issue: > https://www.w3.org/mid/https://www.w3.org/mid/20150730174424.GA7779@c > > If similar issues arise, it might make sense to try get in touch with > them: WebID is quite similar to our setup, and therefore face exactly > the same problems from client side.
I have seen no sign that Chrome or Firefox developers have much interest in supporting WebID either, and given how I've seen one of the WebID people argue their case[1] with the Chrome and Firefox developers, the little interest they might have had to start with is probably gone by now :/ Enrico [1] https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/pX5NbX0Xack/kmHsyMGJZAMJ -- GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enr...@enricozini.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
