On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:46:36AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > I think the success of our stable releases depends on the continued > assessments of each and every maintainer. I don't believe you will find > enough developers and maintainers who are willing to evaluate all > packages in the archive. Who will make the decision if a package is ok > for stable or not?
I agree. I meant to say that I'd like the maintainer to explicitly state, on package upload, whether that version is suitable for testing/stable. > In my opinion the current mechanisms already work > pretty well and the users are the best indicators if a package is suited > for stable or not. If a package cannot be supported in stable, I > wouldn't want it in testing either which I use for the same reasons as > you do. ...and to have a suite, like testing, that: - does not transition to stable, and is intended to be used as is - contains anything that enter testing - also contains the packages that would enter testing but do not because they are not intended for it > So my thoughts in a nutshell. Always talk to upstream before you package > the software, if you are unsure about the suitability for stable. Don't > upload the software if it can't be maintained in stable. Respect the > wishes of upstreams and remove the package (the xscreensaver case), if > they don't understand that there is no technical reason for warning > users about "old software", if it is not broken. 100% agree. > I think such packages would be better suited for PPAs or bikesheds. I somehow expect there to be a significant amount of such software that either ended up in stable by mistake, or isn't entering Debian because of stable. Such software could fit in the kinds of power-user personal systems that currently get addressed by constanly staying on testing. and a testing-like transition workflow. I see value in having it in a single suite, because it can be tested for consistency as a whole, instead of risking of having different behaviour according to what combinations of different PPAs are added to a system. Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enr...@enricozini.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
