On 29 February 2016 at 18:26, Sergey B Kirpichev <skirpic...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 06:02:40PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote: >> there are no releases of non-release architectures > > AFAIK, there is no defined release archs for stretch yet, so > "non-release arch" doesn't make sense before freeze. > > But the whole point was not about severity. One maintainer > clearly "know better" what is a problem and what's not.
In my understanding, a non-release arch stays non-release arch until decided otherwise. Before we had kfreebsd as a release arch it obviously wasn't a release arch, so since it's been removed from release arches bugs affecting it can't be release-critical. -- Cheers, Andrew
