On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:03:31 +0100, Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> wrote: >On 2016-01-04 11:30, Marc Haber wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 22:30:24 +0100, Eric Valette <eric.vale...@free.fr> >> wrote: >>> System admins do like using absolute path >>> for security reasons... >> Please also notice that this is the only option for ExecStart in >> systemd units. Well played, Lennart. > >Similarly skeleton-based init scripts use the full path as well. It >helps if you can stat() it. Which, I guess, you could by extension by >using "which" and the like.
In init scripts, I can do that. In a systemd unit, I cannot. If I can, this brings an ugliness to systemd units I would rather not have, as this would mean losing one of the nicer systemd features. It just saddens me that I have to introduce ugliness because my upstream doesn't share my opinions of prettiness. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
