Hi, On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:34:53AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Thomas Ross <thomasr...@thomasross.io>, 2015-12-13, 16:57: > >The package should actually be called 'Z', but according to reportbug > >that is not a valid package name. > > reportbug is right. As per Policy §5.6.1, package names “must be at > least two characters long”. > > >Are there any suggestions for this? > > My suggestion is to ask upstream about their preference in alternative > names for "z".
Yes. That's the best thing to do. Or at least, install its binary and manpage in some other name such as rupa-z or zjump. And add suggestion to make a short alias such as "z" which does not conflict on the machine in its manpage and README. So user can have a short name if he wishes but will not deprive others to use z as alias. This is a very simple package so maintaining patch is not too much of burden. Osamu
