On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 00:41:35 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:42:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:14:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > > > > If it's a “severe violation of Debian policy”, the bug is at least > > > “serious” severity. > > > > > The release team's RC policy decides which policy violations we consider > > "severe" in the sense of "gets a serious severity bug". > > Indeed, this is how I thought the severities were being used. Not in > theory but in practice. > > Please don't worry about severities. I will try to be "nice" and will > report them as "important", as there are a lot of affected packages. > > But will use some kind of usertags so that release managers are able > to change severities easily. I would love to see this as a release > goal for stretch, but I think it's soon to decide about that. > Sounds great, thanks!
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
