On 22/06/15 13:43, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 23:13:53 +0200
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote:
>>> $ dch -r -D jessie
>>> dch warning: Recognised distributions are: unstable, testing,
>>> stable,
>>> oldstable, experimental,
>>> {testing-,stable-,oldstable-,}proposed-updates,
>>> {testing,stable,oldstable}-security, wheezy-backports,
>>> jessie-backports and UNRELEASED.
>>> Using your request anyway.
>>> dch: Did you see that warning? Press RETURN to continue...
>>>
>>> I don't see any bugs about not accepting Jessie here and if it weren't
>>> deliberate I'd expect older releases to be listed (i.e. it's not just
>>> that devscripts hadn't caught up with Jessie yet).
>>
>> Then please file a bug.
>
> Okay, filed as Bug#789587
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789587
>
>
> Then, which is better: jessie or jessie-proposed-updates?
> and {testing,stable,oldstable}-security and {stretch,jessie,wheezy}-security?
jessie and jessie-security.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5588108a.3030...@debian.org
