On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Christoph Berg <m...@debian.org> wrote: > Re: Luca Falavigna 2015-06-13 > <CADk7b0Nc+pD_zBAhJ=vw8qfnetjgwhkyl+obciopg-dugg8...@mail.gmail.com> >> Would it be also possible to exclude from the view packages no longer >> maintained in the selected suites (see #736715) ? > > That'd be more involved change. We used to only look at > unstable/experimental to gather maintainer information. The problem > with that is if a source package gets renamed, you will (hopefully) > still care about it in stable for security updates, so we need to > extract some maintainer information from stable as well.
I think that is such a small corner case that can be handled adding and extra package to your ddpo. sid/experimental should be the source of truth here, as it used to be: I'm not sure why it was changed, but now the situation is a bit absurd, I have packages I used to maintain in oldstable that are still listed on my ddpo :( -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cab4xwxxpx8xhgph7hshkz0mteap_spdj9voax1kv2c0e2w-...@mail.gmail.com
