On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Neil Williams wrote: > You've admitted that the port cannot keep pace because it needs changes > to be made by maintainers who do not see the port as a particular > priority and that this blocks or impedes further changes. You've > tried and failed to increase the level of interest in the port which > would have changed those priorities and the port has failed to gain more > manpower. That is a failed port.
Sounds like you're saying hurd-i386 has failed because of lazy maintainers? I have certainly merged Hurd and kFreeBSD patches that were submitted and even written patches when they were needed even if I am not currently running these ports. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6HJaqf+=ttqlorkt8r3k8a4yjudwrdipg_1xkub+pn...@mail.gmail.com
