On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> (2015-05-04): >> I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures >> in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and >> other teams. I'm not entirely clear on the status of debian-ports.org, >> and of what the current downsides of using debian-ports are. Maybe it's >> just about supporting and advertising debian-ports as Debian's official >> way to host second-class architectures. Maybe there's more to it. What >> are the current downsides of moving hurd-i386 and sparc to debian-ports? > > Last I heard about it, it was understaffed and infra was undersized + > needed some changes to make it possible to grow. > > This was some time ago, so I've added admin@ to make sure we get updated > intel on this topic.
zumbi was working on moving debian-ports to debian.org infrastructure and got some of it done (the website for instance). I asked him about it on IRC and got this response: <pabs> zumbi: this mail looks like it needs a status update re ports.d.o https://lists.debian.org/20150504062822.ga24...@xanadu.blop.info <zumbi> pabs: we had this: https://titanpad.com/debian-ports <zumbi> pabs: I was hoping for debcamp/debconf to be able to finish it up <zumbi> (however I am still unsure about if I'll be able to attend event) <pabs> zumbi: may I copy that into email or can you? <zumbi> pabs: feel free to copy it <zumbi> pabs: it needs someone with wanna-build database experience, some dsa, aurel32 (and maybe some ftp-master) to complete the work -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6FXYe0te=rE-2B0-8OCgdG=tut_et66mkhu6rgnjwc...@mail.gmail.com
