Hi, Le 18/04/2015 21:27, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> Portability in dpkg is very important, to be able to support downstreams > and people who use it on other systems, or even package it in other > (non-GNU/Linux) distributions. But for many such systems I'm currently > porting purely through documentation. And as such, subsequent build and > run-time issues are clearly reactive, but I'd like to switch to a more > proactive model. So I'd very much appreciate if either interested > parties could provide access to such systems, or setup some kind of > continuous integration system from git. I'm thinking specifically of > systems such as non-glibc based Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Minix, > Solaris, Mac OS X, HP-UX and AIX. > Possibly stating the obvious, but a you aware that fink (a package management system for Mac OS X/Darwin) is based on a dpkg fork? Have you been in touch with them? The MacPorts projects also packaged dpkg (1.14.29). I can presumably update, build and test the macports package occasionally (it doesn't have an individual maintainer atm), but I cannot set up an automated framework (although MacPorts does have autobuilders). Kind regards, Thibaut. --
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
