❦ 15 avril 2015 11:07 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> : >>>> What I have done so far in my package is to include the concatenated >>>> but unminified js from the upstream (that would be my upstream's >>>> upstream) source tarball in debian/missing-sources. During package >>>> build i use uglifyjs (which is already in Debian) to place minified >>>> copies where the app I'm building expects them to be. >>>> As mentioned above, what constitutes preferred form of modification >>>> really is a question of who is doing the modification. Upstream uses >>>> the un-concatenated files, but personally, I would find it easier to >>>> modify one big file, at least for something interpreted like >>>> javascript. >>> >>> What counts is the form preferred by the authors of the code. >> >> Who says that? We can't just invent new rules. > > That is exactly what we can - and do: We invented Debian Policy.
Please, give a source. The Debian Policy doesn't say that what counts is
the form preferred by the authors of the code.
--
The better part of valor is discretion.
-- William Shakespeare, "Henry IV"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
