On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Christian Kastner <deb...@kvr.at> wrote: > On 2015-03-15 21:38, John Goerzen wrote: >> On 03/14/2015 07:36 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote: >>> The main difficulty is to handle the 0.9.5 to 1.x upgrade where the >>> configuration files change. >> I assume you mean the config files change in some dramatic way; that is, >> some way that means the existing files won't work anymore? >> >> If that is the case, why does this have to be a big deal? Couldn't you >> just warn people that the upgrade will break their config, point them to >> the docs, and call it good? After all, if that is all upstream >> provides, isn't it better than nothing? > > Another alternative would be to not implement the upgrade path at all, > and provide a separate roundcube-1.1 package instead, for those willing > to do the migration manually (which I'd argue is a low price to pay).
I do not think it wise to package every point release since roundcube does not intend to break the configs every point release as they did in version 1. However packaging a roundcube-1 is useful IMO (and it would be version 1.0 then 1.1 then 1.2 etc.). Cheers, -- Cameron Norman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/calzwfrjqexvstscv3a+kdsr0auyq0hlcnqaakevhekcrtc7...@mail.gmail.com
