Forgive me if I'm wrong, but a) there are no wolf3d data packages in Debian, even the shareware data is not distributable in non-free, and b) both of the packages you mention are generated on user demand by game-data-packager. The point of listing virtual packages in policy is to aid in coordinating many packages using the same virtual package names. There's no problem coordinating virtual packages names if they are all generated by the same source package, game-data-packager; furthermore since the packages concerned are not actually in Debian, it doesn't seem necessary to document them in Debian policy, IMHO.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150302162726.ga28...@chew.redmars.org
