On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:20:46PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:56:20AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Here's some news about the x32 port. I'm trying a different approach:
> > instead of using only packages uploaded by their {,non-}maintainers, as on
> > ftp.debian-ports.org which tracks unstable, I'm using a separate repository
> > on ftp.debian-x32.org that includes packages with porting patches applied.
> > That is, 54 sourceful uploads that unblock further 1427 source packages.
>
> Why not use the infrastructure already available in debian-ports.org for
> the same purpose? It is expected that packages in debian-ports sometimes
> need patches, and this is perfectly reasonable...
There's an "unreleased" suite, but it's used only for build dependencies
for bootstrap, and is not supposed to be installed by users.
--
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150222143212.ga7...@angband.pl
