]] Ludovico Cavedon > I could have ntopng include a ntop transitional package, but: > - ntop has version 3:5.0.1, ntopng 1.2.1. I would need to bump the ntopng > version to 4, and I am not very excited by that > - there is no migration path from ntop to ntopng. All settings and data would > be lost, therefore I am concerned that people would be disappointed if at > point their instance of ntop is replaced with ntopng with default > credentials, maybe on a different port. > > Should I just request the removal of ntop instead?
Given there's no migration path, I think making sure ntop's mentioned in ntopng's description and just removing ntop would make sense. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/877fx6qoe3....@xoog.err.no
