On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 08:30:07PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 19:12 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 11:51:56AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > Am Samstag, 29. November 2014, 01:32:22 schrieb Zbigniew 
> > > Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> 
> > New dbus client library is also slated to become
> > public when its ready and kdbus is upstreamed. Various dbus apis
> > are documented and stable.
> 
> Have you seen this?
> http://gentooexperimental.org/~patrick/weblog/archives/2014-11.html#e2014-11-23T09_26_01.txt

I have, and I wasn't particularly impressed.

The guy has trouble figuring out what "LockSession(session)" could possibly 
mean.
He criticizes the spec (from 2003) for being hard to implement and then
libsystemd-bus for implementing it. He also misses the fact that d-bus
performance has very little to do with the overhead of 4 bytes in the message
header, but rather the latency caused by multiple context switches, user
space querying /proc to gather information, repeated decodings of a
message as it is passed along, and the occasional transfer of large buffers.

So yeah, it's an uninformed rant with a vaguely defined target.

Zbyszek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141129194901.gd23...@in.waw.pl

Reply via email to