On 13/11/14 06:29, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Daniel Pocock dijo [Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:08:23PM +0100]: >> I didn't want to be too specific, to give other people a chance to make >> suggestions >> >> However, one possibility is that anybody maintaining an essential >> package and anybody who is a DPL delegate would be able to veto. The >> implication is that somebody can still win a GR against the veto, but >> they do so knowing that they will have to find somebody else to maintain >> some essential packages. > As a DPL delegate, I'd strongly veto that idea. That clearly creates > first- and second-class citizens.
Not quite: if people are choosing not to remain a citizen at all, then they are neither first or second class. If there was such a scheme in place, then I don't think people could use it frivolously, at least not for too long. E.g. maintainer of essential package foo vetoes 5 GRs in a row. At some point, other people will start stepping forward to maintain that package or propose an alternative. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54646273.7070...@pocock.pro
