Hi, FTWIW, the copyright format specification https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-field explicitly states:
Use of a standard short name does not override the Debian Policy
requirement to include the full license text in
debian/copyright, nor any requirements in the license of the
work regarding reproduction of legal notices. This information
must still be included in the License field, either in a
stand-alone License paragraph or in the relevant files
paragraph.
(Although I find that unfortunate, and makes me much less motivated to
find out whether a license that looks like a BSD license is actually
one of them on the list, if I still have to include it in the file.)
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F
JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
