El sáb, 6 de sep 2014 a las 2:18 , Ansgar Burchardt
<ans...@debian.org> escribió:
Noel Torres <env...@rolamasao.org> writes:
If you need dbus, you should Depend on dbus, and systemd should
Provides dbus.
Then, if Ann programs her Own Dbus Implementation she can package
it as aodi
(Ann's Own Dbus Implementation) and have aodi Provides dbus. Same
for logind
(systemd Provides logind and random-package Depends logind), and
any other
piece of the big systemd ecosystem.
Any dependence on systemd or any other init system should be
considered an RC
bug (except only packages designed to manage the init system, like
an
imaginary systemd-tweaking-tool).
That doesn't change anything in practice as long as systemd would be
the
only package providing logind. So until someone writes an alternative
implementation, it would just be useless work.
systemd-shim can get you a logind implementation w/o systemd as PID 1.
With the above scenario (virtual packages like logind), apt would be
smart and install the least disruptive package. Do you think that would
be systemd-shim (no removal of current init) or systemd-sysv (removal
of packages)?
Best,
--
Cameron Norman
