Hi, h...@shaw.ca: > Most people who are not OK with systemd have better things to than try to > persuade debian-devel that the debian prject's transition to it is > problematic, and at more than just the implementation level. > By now, I would sure hope so.
> More important than numbers is content. The objections being raised seem > diverse, dire and cogent, while the defenses seem to be mere vague > reassurances expressed in tones just as dismissive as yours was just there. > The operative word is "seem". I quoted the word 'discussion' because, frankly, for both sides of this argument, the other side is the one who expresses mere vague reassurances|objections while ignoring relevant facts. -- -- Matthias Urlichs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140906163137.gm21...@smurf.noris.de
