On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:32:49AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > At the time, we (font team) decided to go with z9, the fact that > packages were arch:all (and therefore that the memory cost of > compression had only an impact on the machine of the developer who > builds packages), was a strong argument to go with z9. > > Of course, if we go to source only uploads for arch:all, we'll > reconsider this and eventually revert to default settings. > > (still, this memory impact has never been one on the good old Dell > Poweredge 2650 that sits in my garage and builds most of the font > packages I upload..... Of course, it is not a buildd that builds > hundreds of packages a day) Decompression costs were mentioned too, and they always matter (if they are significant). Does anyone have numbers about them?
-- WBR, wRAR -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140903054929.ga16...@belkar.wrar.name
