On 08/18/2014 07:47 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 08/17/2014 03:52 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >>>>> - the above layout is for the traditional case of non-native packages, >>>>> what would be the layout for native packages? how can be differentiate >>>>> between native/non-native layout? >>>> >>>> Please don't. It would be Really Troublesome should a package need to >>>> switch from native to non-native, or the opposite. >>> >>> Why? >>> >>> Until we have defined what the layout is for a native package, you can't >>> assume this. It's possibly a subset of the conventions for non-native >>> packages + some common conventions in all software projects. >>> >>> Something like: >>> - branches >>> - master: main development branch >> >> Please don't use "master". It's meaningless. It just happens to be the >> default in Git, but that's about it. > > It is not meaningless in the sense that it is a widely used convention in > git repositories.
A widely used convention to express what? The fact that you didn't bother changing the default name of the branch? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53f1a515.1090...@debian.org
