On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:44:15PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Aug 17, Marc Haber <mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de> wrote:
> > Please. The attitute of requiring Debian maintainers to modify > > upstream software instead of having simple two-line extension to an > > init script is really unfriendly. Why do only systemd friends keep > > recommending this? > Maybe because the others do not care enough about improving software > quality. Contrary to the views of the systemd authors, "software quality" is not some abstract ideal that exists in a vacuum. Software's quality is judged by how well it meets the needs of users, which absolutely includes the requirement that it *work smoothly across upgrades*. It's one thing to discourage the use of /etc/default files, which I agree are a lousy convention that should be deprecated. It's quite another to completely drop admins' settings on the floor on upgrade, or to regard the upgrade issues as "somebody else's problem" (more specifically, downstreams'). -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
