On Fri, Aug 15, 2014, at 15:37, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > And any package that cannot build arch:all on a released arch for which > it produces binary packages potentially has a FTBFS bug, anyway, which > can be reported by any interested parties. Exceptions would be arches > that are too resource-constrained to build it in the first place.
I have encountered a situation where the FTBFS bug was caused by segfault in other package. This has forced me to split opendnssec-doc to arch:all package (which was good thing anyway), so there are cases where you want to build the arch:all on most stable and fastest arch. Could we just pick amd64 and be done? :) Cheers, -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1408111452.213427.153089893.5c8a7...@webmail.messagingengine.com
