On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:07:25AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> > But the problem with lots of small packages is not that the Packages.xz
> > has too many bytes.
> > It's that the packaging tools, UIs (for users and developers), and
> > humans, need to think about too many packages.
> > This makes packaging tools slow, UIs cluttered, and humans confused.
> 
> So we need to figure out how to solve that problem.  But "don't package
> things" is not a good solution to that problem, obviously, and "don't
> package small things" or "don't use a packaging structure that works well
> for our tools" aren't much better.

SCNR
 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422139#151

Regards, Gerrit.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140725172802.16488.qm...@22ba4216a2609a.315fe32.mid.smarden.org

Reply via email to