Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > On kfreebsd, init would then depend on an optional package as we don't > > support arch-specific priorities. That is (IIRC) a policy violation, but > > do any practical problems arise from this? > > It would be useful to have a comment from one of the debootstrap > maintainers about this, I think. That's the only one I can think of > that actually cares much.
debootstrap resolves dependencies of required packages when installing them, so I think it will install sysvinit-core to satisfy init's dependency on freebsd. Notice that sysvinit currently indirectly depends on insserv, which is prority optional. debootstrap handles installing that just fine. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
