Isn't a single (rather small) hash value enough for almost all users?
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> wrote: > Food for thought: > Which fields take up most space in Packages.xz[0]? > > (whole file) 6662.0 KiB 100.0% > SHA256 1463.8 KiB 22.0% > SHA1 938.9 KiB 14.1% > Description-md5 794.3 KiB 11.9% > MD5sum 752.4 KiB 11.3% > Depends 473.0 KiB 7.1% > Description 463.4 KiB 7.0% > Filename 338.9 KiB 5.1% > Homepage 183.1 KiB 2.7% > Tag 176.1 KiB 2.6% > Size 168.3 KiB 2.5% > Maintainer 161.3 KiB 2.4% > Installed-Size 144.6 KiB 2.2% > Package 134.5 KiB 2.0% > Version 73.4 KiB 1.1% > Suggests 68.9 KiB 1.0% > Recommends 63.7 KiB 1.0% > > > [0] More precisely: for each field, how much would Packages.xz shrink if > we removed this (and only this) field? > > -- > Jakub Wilk > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140714162547.ga3...@jwilk.net > >
