Hi Steffen and all, today while talking with a backbox project administrator I discovered that popular tools such as openvas directly calls the amap binary.
I never talked with them, but I don't think it is feasible to ask to every security tool provider to patch their code for the only debian benefit. I think I'm then changing again my opinion: the conflict field might be the only proper way to be sure such popular tools (not packaged in debian and some of them not even free) continue to work. Is this one a good reason for a conflict? Thanks for reading, Gianfranco, who really don't want this kind of flame wars in such a beautiful project as debian. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
