Le Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 10:33:35AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 04:37:16PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > > > > This violates the Policy's section 10.1, but it is still my favorite > > > solution > > > for the reason that you explained above. > > > > I don't agree, packages should not be in conflict when it can be easily > > avoided > > by renaming files. > > +1
Hi Andreas, Feel free to rename yourself, but do not forget to remove me from the uploaders list. On my side I find these renamings harmful and illogical. The probability that people want to use both amaps on the same machine is close to zero, and the probability that users of both amaps will be annoyed by the rename is close to one. I think that these renamings are applied dogmatically in a way that makes Debian inferior. I do not want to participate to this. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140706134930.ga2...@falafel.plessy.net
