Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> writes:
> On 06/25/2014 03:59 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le mercredi 25 juin 2014 à 14:29 +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>>> Do you know any other package like systemd, with a non-negligible amount
>>> of users willing to *not* have it installed, but which is always brought
>>> back by insidious reverse dependencies?
>>
>> “Insidious reverse dependencies”?
>>
>> You are insinuating that people are surreptitiously adding dependencies
>> on systemd components their packages don’t need, just so that they get
>> installed on your system to piss you off.
>
> No. It's probably not intentional. But the effect is the same.
>
> I used the word "Insidious" as I would have use "Stealth", because it's
> happening slowly, without us noticing, that everything in Debian is
> being locked with systemd.
Given the amount of noise that e.g. you and Svante never seem to get
tired of producing, I am pretty sure that it's not happening without you
noticing (and you telling the world about it).
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/8738ese1wi....@vostro.rath.org
