Hi Christoph, On Montag, 16. Juni 2014, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Well I guess the reason for flash is rather the license, isn't it?
no, it's in contrib, because it's a downloader package.
> Anyway... just because something it in contrib/non-free for legal
> reasons... I see no necessity to handle such packages less secure.
both torbrowser-launcher as well as flashplugin-nonfree use gpg to verify
securely what they've downloaded.
so I guess you will need to pick on other examples ;-) And just file bugs when
you find these. And probably suggest a patch to Debian policy :-)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
